Page 4198 - Week 12 - Thursday, 1 December 2022

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


Given that the last update on the City Services website for the Molonglo River bridge crossing project description is that the Government is currently evaluating the responses to a tender process that closed in June 2022, can the Minister provide an update on the progress of this project and how far along the evaluation of the tender responses is.

Mr Steel: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

The evaluation has been completed by the Tender Evaluation Team and the team is currently working to finalise tender reports.

A contract award for the Design and Construction work is anticipated to occur in Quarter 1 2023.

Parking—company ownership
(Question No 999)

Mrs Kikkert asked the Minister for Transport and City Services, upon notice, on 2 December 2022:

(1) Who is the predominant owner of the carparks immediately adjacent (ie, the carparks most customers would use to park at the businesses in the CZ4 zone) to the CZ4 Local Centre Zone’s in the Ginninderra and Yerrabi electorates.

(2) Who is the predominant owner of the carparks immediately adjacent to the shopping centres of (a) Amaroo around Pioneer Street, (b) Charnwood around Charnwood Place, (c) Hawker, (d) Jamison, (e) Kaleen around Georgina Crescent, (f) Kippax Fair and (g) Nicholls along O’Hanlon Place.

(3) Who is the predominant owner of the carparks along (a) Huddart Circuit, (b) Baillieu Circuit, (c) Kemble Circuit and (d) Winchcombe Circuit Mitchell, in Mitchell.

Mr Steel: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) Transport Canberra and City Services (TCCS).

(2) As above.

(3) As above.

Land—environmental impact statement exemptions
(Question No 1000)

Ms Clay asked the Minister for Planning and Land Management, upon notice, on 2 December 2022:

(1) Given that Block 12, Section 1, Denman Prospect, acts as a buffer between ecologically rich Bluett’s Block and the Denman Prospect Urban Footprint and that there is currently an application on foot to exempt this block from an environmental impact statement, what further technical or other reports have been requested of or prepared or submitted by the proponent for the purposes of the proposal and


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video