Page 3582 - Week 08 - Thursday, 18 August 2011
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
(f) the costs and benefits of proposed changes to the compliance hierarchy underpinning the private sector workers’ compensation scheme and administrative obligations imposed on employers; and
(g) options for improvement to the design and operation of the private sector workers’ compensation scheme.
(3) I consider that the law and guidelines in relation to Regulatory Impact Statements have been applied appropriately.
(4) See (3) above.
Government—regulatory impact statements
(Question No 1654)
Mr Smyth asked the Minister for Economic Development, upon notice, on 30 June 2011:
(1) How many Regulatory Impact Statements (RIS) have been prepared in the Minister’s portfolio since October 2008.
(2) What was the subject of each completed RIS.
(3) How many matters should have, but did not have, an RIS prepared.
(4) What was the subject of each matter for which an RIS should have been prepared but was not.
Mr Barr: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(1) Three.
(2)
• Racing Amendment Bill 2009
• Unlawful Gambling Bill 2009
• Gaming Machine (Club Governance) Amendment Bill 2011
(3) None. It is considered that the law and guidelines in relation to Regulatory Impact Statements have been applied appropriately.
(4) See (3) above.
Government—regulatory impact statements
(Question No 1655)
Mr Smyth asked the Minister for Education and Training, upon notice, on 30 June 2011:
(1) How many Regulatory Impact Statements (RIS) have been prepared in the Minister’s portfolio since October 2008.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video