Page 3940 - Week 12 - Thursday, 23 November 2006
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
(2) How effective have these arrangements been;
(3) If no such collaborative arrangements have been put in place, why not.
Mr Stanhope: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(1) John Hargreaves MLA, Minister for Territory and Municipal Services, has established a Taskforce with representatives from various Commonwealth and Territory Departments along with representatives from the Canberra International Airport to facilitate planning of transport connections within the Airport precinct.
(2) The effectiveness of the arrangements will become more evident once the Taskforce has concluded its work.
(3) Not applicable
Land—native title
(Question No 1346)
Mrs Burke asked the Minister for Indigenous Affairs, upon notice, on 18 October 2006:
When the ACT Government recognises the traditional Ngun(n)awal owners of traditional land in the ACT, which people is the ACT Government recognising and which groups of people are being recognised as having historical connection with Ngun(n)awal land.
Mr Stanhope: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
In acknowledging the Ngun(n)awal people as the ‘traditional owners’ of the land presently occupied by the Australian Capital Territory, the ACT Government is recognising the historical connection of that people with that land. In so doing, the ACT Government does not seek to determine any question of traditional ownership which is or could be the subject of a claim at law for native title.
Rhodium Asset Solutions Ltd
(Question No 1355)
Mr Stefaniak asked the Chief Minister, upon notice, on 19 October 2006:
(1) Who approved the remuneration package paid to the former Chief Executive Officer of Rhodium;
(2) Did the package include the cash advance and Lexus motor vehicle;
(3) Were (a) the Board and (b) Rhodium shareholders advised of the remuneration package; if so, how and when;
(4) Was anyone in the ACT Government advised of the remuneration package; if so, how, when and who was advised.
Mr Stanhope: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .