Page 4361 - Week 13 - Thursday, 17 November 2005
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
considered as ‘bullying’:
(a) 2003-2004 – 1 (one)
(b) 2004-2005 – 0 (zero)
(b) 2005 - to date – 0 (zero)
(2) The department does not have aggregated data on complaints of ‘bullying’ of teachers by teachers and the breakdown of complaints by school.
(3) The department manages these matters through various mechanisms as appropriate for individual situations. Some matters are resolved at a local level, other matters are resolved by accessing the department’s Staff Equity Contact Officers (SECOs) and/or Employee Assistance Program (EAP), and other matters are referred to the department for a more formal investigation and resolution.
Development—Kingston
(Question No 639)
Mr Seselja asked the Minister for Planning, upon notice, on 21 September 2005:
(1) In relation to the Land Development Agency (LDA) auction on 31 August 2005 and Block 1 Section 52 Kingston being passed in, (a) how many bids were received for the block at the auction, (b) what was the amount of the final bid, and (c) how many parties, if any, are currently in negotiations to purchase the block;
(2) Does the failure of the sale of this block indicate that the market conditions for the ACT have changed in relation to multi-unit sites;
(3) What impact will the failure of the sale of Block 1 Section 52 Kingston have on the expected dividend from the LDA to the Territory for 2005-06.
Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(1) (a) 13
(b) $2.8m
(c) 2
(2) While Block 1 Section 52 Kingston was not sold at the auction on 31 August 2005 and this may indicate that the market has changed in relation to multi-unit sites, LDA will continue to monitor the market to ensure that land releases are appropriately matched to market demand.
(3) While the expected revenues will be affected if Block 1 Section 52 Kingston is not sold, LDA has advised that the budgeted dividend to the Territory for 2005-06 will be met.
Development—Amaroo
(Question No 640)
Mr Seselja asked the Minister for Planning, upon notice, on 21 September 2005:
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .