Page 858 - Week 03 - Thursday, 2 April 2020

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


(6) When was this footpath first built.

(7) Can the Minister provide information, from the last five years, as to (a) how many inspectors have been sent to the Muntz Street path to inspect the path, (b) how many separate orders for repair have been made, (c) how many different contractors have been used in these processes and (d) what is the total cost for all these processes.

Mr Steel: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:

(1) Yes. The figure is an estimated cost summary for a works package (including Chisholm).

(2) The cost estimate includes labour, materials, construction management and traffic control costs.

(3) See response to Question 1.

(4) ‘Coldmix’ asphalt was used to remove an immediate safety trip hazard in December 2019.

(5) See response to Question 1.

(6) The path network in Chisholm was constructed between 1974 and 1977.

(7) (a) Three.

(b) Six.

(c) One.

(d) $18,859.40.

Asbestos—non-residential sites
(Question No 2912)

Mr Coe asked the Minister for Planning and Land Management, upon notice, on 14 February 2020 (redirected to the Minister for Employment and Workplace Safety):

(1) How many (a) commercial, (b) mixed use or (c) other non-residential sites in the ACT have been identified as still containing loose filled asbestos, such as Mr Fluffy and what are the block and section numbers, and street addresses for each site.

(2) In relation to part (1), how many (a) commercial, (b) mixed use or (c) other non-residential sites have been listed on the Affected Properties List available on the Asbestos Response Taskforce website.

(3) For those properties which have not been listed on the website, why have they not been included.

(4) Is there an intention to make the location of these sites publicly available; if not, why not and why are these properties treated differently to residential sites; if so, when and where will the locations be published.

(5) How many (a) commercial, (b) mixed use or (c) other non-residential sites in the ACT have loose fill asbestos removed and are not on the register and what are the block and section numbers of these blocks.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video