Page 1686 - Week 05 - Thursday, 5 May 2016

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video


2003-2004 - 0.48 yrs (Note: ACTION purchased 20 new buses that were available due to an operator going into liquidation and not being able to complete the purchase of an order. These buses, although never previously registered, were up to 20 months old at delivery.

2004-2005 - 0 years

2005-2006 - 0 years

2006-2007 - 0 years

2007-2008 - Nil

2008-2009 - 0 years

2009-2010 - 0 years

2010-2011 - 0 years

2011-2012 - 0 years

2012-2013 - 0 years

2013-2014 - 0 years

2014-2015 - 0 years

2015-2016 to date - 0 years

(3)

(a) 25 buses were leased for a period of 10 years from 1997. One bus is currently on lease to replace an older bus that was destroyed by fire.

(b) Financial details for the leasing of the 25 buses are not available. Costs for ongoing lease of the one bus are $5,500 per month. Set up costs including fitting of cameras ticketing and NXTBUS were $6,600.

(c) 10 years.

(d) The 25 leased buses were aged 0 at the time of the lease in 1997. The currently leased bus was 2.5 years of age when the lease term began.

Roads—projects
(Question No 698)

Mr Coe asked the Minister for Transport and Municipal Services, upon notice, on 10 March 2016:

(1) Can the Minister list the road projects which the Government has committed to deliver.

(2) Of the projects identified in part (1), can the Minister list the (a) priority level and the expected cost of each project for (i) the remainder of 2015-2016, (ii) 2016-2017, (iii) 2017-2018, (iv) 2018-2019, (v) 2019-2020 and (vi) 2020 2021, (b) projects which are already underway and their expected completion dates and (c) proposed timing of the remainder road projects.

(3) What criteria have been used to assess proposed road projects to determine their level of priority.

(4) Will the Canberra community be given any input into the process of determining the priority of road projects before the final decision is made on which road projects have the highest level of priority.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video