Page 2937 - Week 10 - Tuesday, 13 August 2013
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
collected through the fare box, the degree of supplementation to be paid and the exposure of the Territory in a Public Private Partnership due to an under achievement of projected boarding.
Recommendation 103 is:
The Committee recommends that the ACT Government detail how much rates and land tax will increase on the Capital Metro route.
Recommendation 104 is:
The Committee recommends that the ACT Government make publically available maps detailing the areas of expected greater density along the route of the Capital Metro.
Recommendation 105 is:
The Committee recommends that the Government detail what impact Capital Metro will have on ACTION.
Recommendation 106 is:
The Committee recommends that the ACT Government detail the projected patronage of Capital Metro.
Recommendation 107 is:
The Committee recommends that the governance arrangements for Capital Metro, including names of planning and steering committee Members, be published on an ACT Government website.
So there is a comprehensive range of recommendations covering a vast range of issues in regard to the capital metro project.
It is interesting to go to the government’s response. In regard to releasing the submission and all other documents, the response is:
Agreed in principle.
Yet again we have got this new era of transparency, but only in principle. The response to the committee’s recommendation on publishing on an ACT government website a detailed budget of the light rail is:
Not agreed.
They are not going to tell us what the cost of this project is. We are being asked to sign up but we are not allowed to know. The response is:
Not agreed.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video