Page 808 - Week 02 - Thursday, 25 February 2010
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video
|
(a) |
Payables (ACT Procurement Solution) |
$8,370,056 |
|
(b) |
Finance Lease Liabilities for motor vehicles |
$5,359,636 |
|
(c) |
Revenue Received in Advance (Commonwealth Health Program Grant) |
$2,607,786 |
|
(d) |
Payables (InTACT) |
$1,883,720 |
|
(e) |
Revenue Received in Advance (Commonwealth High Cost Drugs) |
$1,532,200 |
|
(f) |
Revenue Received in Advance (Government Payment for Outputs for services rolled into the next financial year) |
$974,200 |
|
(g) |
Payables for supplier |
$751,794 |
|
(h) |
Payables (VMO fee) |
$750,585 |
|
(i) |
Revenue Received in Advance (Donations) |
$728,052 |
|
(j) |
Payables for supplier |
$677,081 |
(3) None of the liabilities listed above are loans.
(4) The top ten contingent liabilities ranked by value are
|
(a) |
Medical Negligence |
$1,000,000 |
|
(b) |
Medical Negligence |
$250,000 |
|
(c) |
Medical Negligence |
$200,000 |
|
(d) |
Medical Negligence |
$200,000 |
|
(e) |
Medical Negligence |
$90,000 |
|
(f) |
Medical Negligence |
$70,000 |
|
(g) |
Medical Negligence |
$50,000 |
|
(h) |
Medical Negligence |
$50,000 |
|
(i) |
Medical Negligence |
$50,000 |
|
(j) |
Medical Negligence |
$10,000 |
Planning—building legislation
(Question No 518)
Ms Le Couteur asked the Minister for Planning, upon notice, on 10 December 2009:
(1) Is the Minister able to say under what legislation were the Buildings (Design and Siting) Ordinance Act 1964 (BDSO/BDSA) and the Building Act 1972 (the Building Act) as enforced up to and including 1975 to 1978 able to be granted further amendments in 1997 and 1998 while ever construction was ongoing and not within the condition of the status of not being in force under section 33A of the 1979 version of the Building Act 1972.
(2) During 1997 to 1998, were new amendments able to be approved under sections 33 and 33A of the Building Act by a Planning and Land Management (PALM)/ACT Planning and Land Authority ACTPLA) Building Controller/Deputy Building Controller on the still in-force 1978 approvals.
(3) During 1997 to 1998, was a Deputy Building Controller able to approve the 1978 still in-force “brought forward” approvals to be re-approved under the Land (Planning and Environment) Act 1991 [the Land Act] without the lawful application approval process of sections 226, 229, 230 and 247 and with compliance of the requirements of Appendix III.1 in relation to the City Plan.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . . Video