Page 2064 - Week 06 - Thursday, 8 June 2006
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
(2) What was the average time taken by ACTPLA or its predecessors for approval of a (a) non single residential and (b) commercial development each year from 1995 to 2005 inclusive, not including those which were subject to call in powers being exercised.
Mr Corbell: The answer to the member’s question is as follows:
(1)
Development applications received (not including those which were subject to call in powers being exercised):
| 
 Year  | 
 (a) single residential lodgements  | 
 (b) and (c) non single residential & commercial lodgements*  | 
| 
 1995  | 
 4122  | 
 1006  | 
| 
 1996  | 
 3747  | 
 874  | 
| 
 1997  | 
 4107  | 
 827  | 
| 
 1998  | 
 4368  | 
 959  | 
| 
 1999  | 
 4279  | 
 981  | 
| 
 2000  | 
 3596  | 
 1013  | 
| 
 2001  | 
 4139  | 
 930  | 
| 
 2002  | 
 5069  | 
 962  | 
| 
 2003  | 
 4947  | 
 776  | 
| 
 2004  | 
 4228  | 
 831  | 
| 
 2005  | 
 3988  | 
 896  | 
* Unable to split data into non single residential and commercial as data not collected in this way
(2)
Average time for approval (business days) - not including those which were subject to call in powers being exercised:
| 
 Year  | 
 (a) and (b) non single residential and commercial *  | 
| 
 1995  | 
 71  | 
| 
 1996  | 
 45  | 
| 
 1997  | 
 35  | 
| 
 1998  | 
 41  | 
| 
 1999  | 
 34  | 
| 
 2000  | 
 39  | 
| 
 2001  | 
 30  | 
| 
 2002  | 
 30  | 
| 
 2003  | 
 33  | 
| 
 2004  | 
 35  | 
| 
 2005  | 
 29  | 
* Unable to split data into non single residential and commercial as data not collected in this way
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .