Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2002 Week 11 Hansard (24 September) . . Page.. 3172 ..


MR STANHOPE (continuing):

Glen Gaskill, dated 5 September 2002.

Schedule D variation:

Peter Gordon, dated 5 September 2002.

I ask for leave to make a statement in relation to the contracts.

Leave granted.

MR STANHOPE: Mr Speaker, these documents are tabled in accordance with sections 31A and 79 of the Public Sector Management Act, which require the tabling of all executive contracts and contract variations. Contracts were previously tabled on 27 August 2002.

Today I present one long-term contract, five short-term contracts and one contract variation. Details of the contracts will be circulated to members.

Papers

Mr Stanhope presented the following papers:

ACT Criminal Justice-Statistical Profile for the June 2002 quarter.

ACT Public Hospitals-Reports on Purchased Services-3rd and 4th quarters 2001-02.

Financial management instruments

Papers and statement by minister

MR QUINLAN (Treasurer, Minister for Economic Development, Business and Tourism, Minister for Sport, Racing and Gaming and Minister for Police, Emergency Services and Corrections): For the information of members, I present the following papers:

Financial Management Act, pursuant to section 14-Instruments (2) directing a transfer of funds between appropriations, including statements of reasons.

I ask for leave to make a short statement.

Leave granted.

MR QUINLAN: Mr Speaker, I have tabled these instruments issued under section 14 of the Financial Management Act and statements for the reasons for the transfer of funds between appropriations by direction of the executive.

The first instrument relates to the 2001-02 financial year. Through an administrative oversight, the tabling of the original instrument of the previous government in August of last year reflected only one signature rather than the required two. The instrument being tabled today reflects a retrospective correction. The Assembly should note that the only change to the original instrument is in its authorisation. No monetary amounts were affected.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .