Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1998 Week 6 Hansard (2 September) . . Page.. 1832 ..
MR BERRY: Mr Speaker, just to formally close off the debate - - -
MR SPEAKER: You have. Is leave granted for Mr Berry to speak again?
MR BERRY: I note what Mr Osborne says in relation to the language that he has used, but I think the language basically means the same as the original motion. If the Assembly calls for, requires or urges, it basically means the same. It is really up to us to determine in the end.
That the amendment (Mr Rugendyke's) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 9 NOES, 6 Ms Carnell Mr Berry Mr Cornwell Mr Corbell Mr Hird Mr Quinlan Mr Kaine Mr Stanhope Mr Moore Ms Tucker Mr Osborne Mr Wood Mr Rugendyke Mr Smyth Mr StefaniakQuestion so resolved in the affirmative.
MR SPEAKER: The question now is: That the motion, as amended, be agreed to. Those of that opinion say aye; to the contrary, no. I think the noes have it.
Mr Berry: The ayes have it.
MR SPEAKER: Very well, we shall have another division, but I did not hear anything from the ayes.
That the motion (Mr Berry's), as amended, be agreed to.
A call of the Assembly having concluded -