Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1998 Week 6 Hansard (2 September) . . Page.. 1832 ..

MR BERRY: Mr Speaker, just to formally close off the debate - - -

MR SPEAKER: You have. Is leave granted for Mr Berry to speak again?

Leave granted.

MR BERRY: I note what Mr Osborne says in relation to the language that he has used, but I think the language basically means the same as the original motion. If the Assembly calls for, requires or urges, it basically means the same. It is really up to us to determine in the end.

Question put:

That the amendment (Mr Rugendyke's) be agreed to.

The Assembly voted -

AYES, 9	 	NOES, 6

Ms Carnell	Mr Berry
Mr Cornwell	Mr Corbell
Mr Hird		Mr Quinlan
Mr Kaine	Mr Stanhope
Mr Moore	Ms Tucker
Mr Osborne	Mr Wood
Mr Rugendyke
Mr Smyth
Mr Stefaniak
Question so resolved in the affirmative.

MR SPEAKER: The question now is: That the motion, as amended, be agreed to. Those of that opinion say aye; to the contrary, no. I think the noes have it.

Mr Berry: The ayes have it.

MR SPEAKER: Very well, we shall have another division, but I did not hear anything from the ayes.

Question put:

That the motion (Mr Berry's), as amended, be agreed to.

A call of the Assembly having concluded -

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .