Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .
Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1996 Week 8 Hansard (27 June) . . Page.. 2369 ..
Question put:
That the amendment (Mr Berry's) be agreed to.
The Assembly voted -
AYES, 7 NOES, 8 Mr Berry Mrs Carnell Ms Horodny Mr Cornwell Ms McRae Mr Hird Ms Reilly Mr Humphries Ms Tucker Mr Kaine Mr Whitecross Mr Moore Mr Wood Mr Osborne Mr StefaniakQuestion so resolved in the negative.
MS TUCKER (8.12): I seek leave to move an amendment that has been circulated in Mrs Carnell's name.
Leave granted.
MS TUCKER: I move:
Page 6, lines 29 to 35, clause 10, omit the clause.
This amendment was consequential on the other amendments that were made before. Clause 10 relates to an opinion referred to in subparagraphs 8(3)(b)(ii) and 9(3)(b)(ii). As those clauses have been amended, this clause obviously needs to be omitted. The amendment is to omit clause 10.
Amendment agreed to.
MR BERRY (8.14): Mr Speaker, I seek leave to move an amendment which has been circulated in the name of Mr Moore.
MR SPEAKER: Order! There has been a great deal of talk about open government here, but everybody seems to be moving amendments in different names.
MR BERRY: Mr Speaker, I do not recall any promises of an open opposition and crossbench.
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . .