Page 4883 - Week 15 - Thursday, 8 December 1994

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .


14. No. The proposal does not have multi storey buildings to all four

boundaries.

15. The Performance Measures require 35 percent of the total block to be

retained as open space and this has been achieved.

16. The proposal does not satisfy the provision of 2.25 parking spaces per

unit as this generation rate is for multi dwelling residential developments

and does not distinguish between aged persons accommodation which

generates parking at a reduced rate. The 21 carparking spaces provided

on-site for stage 4 of the development are consistent with the ACT

Planning Authoritys parking guidelines.

17. The proposal is for a four storey building along Hanna Place, projecting a

two storey facade to Hanna Place. Agreement to four storey

development along Hanna Place was granted in September 1989 by the

then Interim Territory Planning Authority and contained no reference to

minimum setback requirements. There is four storey development

adjoining the pocket park but it is setback 3 metres from the boundary.

18. The plans recently submitted include a proposal for an aged persons

home.

19. Yes. As a result of the provision of plans for outstanding work and

subsequent discussions with the lessee, an extension of time was agreed

to allow the completion of the project.

20. Yes. Complete plans have not been submitted. However the recent

Design and Siting approval is subject to further detailed plans being

submitted prior to the approval taking effect. The Design and Siting

approval is subject to an appeal. Further detail cannot be finalised until

the appeal is heard. It should be noted however, that the plans required

for design and siting purposes are less detailed than Building Plans.

21. Action regarding all breaches of lease conditions has taken place. It was

after extensive consultation with the lessee that an extension of time was

granted.

22. Special consideration has not been given to this particular developer.

The complex issues surrounding this development have been handled in

a manner consistent with that taken for all other cases of this nature.

4883


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .