Page 3275 - Week 11 - Wednesday, 21 September 1994

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

---

Amendments agreed to.

Bill, as a whole, as amended, agreed to.

Bill, as amended, agreed to.

RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL TENANCIES

Draft Code of Practice and Discussion Paper

Debate resumed from 20 October 1993, on motion by Mr Connolly:

That the Assembly takes note of the papers.

Question resolved in the affirmative.

MAGISTRATES COURT (CIVIL JURISDICTION)

(AMENDMENT) BILL (NO. 2) 1994]

Debate resumed from 23 August 1994, on motion by Mr Connolly:

That this Bill be agreed to in principle.

MR HUMPHRIES (5.20): I have just a short comment, Madam Speaker. I, of course, support the Bill; but I wonder why it is necessary, given that section 7 of the new Commercial and Tenancy Tribunal Bill actually says exactly the same thing. As I said, there is a slight question mark about that; but obviously, since they are essentially the same, we support both.

MR CONNOLLY (Attorney-General and Minister for Health) (5.20), in reply: It was just to make it abundantly clear, so that we did not create a conflict, that we put it in both Bills.

Question resolved in the affirmative.

Bill agreed to in principle.

Leave granted to dispense with the detail stage.

Bill agreed to.

---

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .