Page 5381 - Week 17 - Tuesday, 3 December 1991

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .


considerable effort on the part of the board and at the end of the year we will be able to give you a very accurate figure. The process of negotiations is very important. The target savings are the important issue, Mr Humphries, as you would know.

Construction Employees Redundancy Trust

MR COLLAERY: My question is to the Minister who wants to own up for the long service leave board. It could be the Chief Minister or Mr Berry. I will ask the question first, Mr Speaker, because it is quite complex. Mr Berry, of course, likes complex questions. I ask, firstly, whether funds paid into the Construction Employees Redundancy Trust by Canberra workers on building sites have gone interstate to an interstate fund, and if so - Mr Berry shakes his shoulders - whether they form any part of the $1.5m donation referred to in the current royal commission in New South Wales into the building industry. The $1.5m paid, which "broke all the rules" when the money was paid - - -

Mr Berry: Quoted from whom?

MR COLLAERY: I will quote from the Financial Review of 2 December 1991. It is known, Mr Berry, for being more accurate than you, I would say.

Ms Follett: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I think that should be withdrawn.

MR SPEAKER: I do not believe that that is a valid point of order.

MR COLLAERY: They are sensitive. The paper reports that the Australian Federation of Construction Contractors, on 27 October this year, asked the trustees of CERT for $500,000. The paper reported proceedings before the royal commission and said that the money was paid up within three days, with little idea of how the money would be spent. I ask Mr Berry whether he is aware of what happened to those workers' moneys, and can he comment on that incident revealed in Sydney?

MR BERRY: I cannot comment on it because I have not read the article. I will have the matter examined.

Board of Health Business Rules

MR STEFANIAK: My question is to the Minister for Health. Will the Minister explain the new so-called business rules that apply to the Board of Health? Will he also explain what increased expenditure, such as wage increases, the board will not be held accountable for?


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .