Page 5021 - Week 16 - Tuesday, 26 November 1991

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .

---

believing that they were not protected fauna". All that is there. Why can you not apply that to yourselves as Ministers? If you apply it to every other decision maker, why can you not apply the same to yourselves? It is a case of what is good for the goose being good for the gander. But you are not going to accept it.

Question put:

That the amendment (Mr Collaery's) be agreed to.

The Assembly voted -

AYES, 4  NOES, 13 

Mr Collaery Mr Berry
Mr Duby Mr Connolly
Mr Jensen Ms Follett
Dr Kinloch Mrs Grassby
 Mr Humphries
 Mr Kaine
 Ms Maher
 Mr Moore
 Mrs Nolan
 Mr Prowse
 Mr Stefaniak
 Mr Stevenson
 Mr Wood

Question so resolved in the negative.

Clause agreed to.

Remainder of Bill, by leave, taken as a whole, and agreed to.

Bill agreed to.

NEW CAPITAL WORKS PROGRAM 1991-92 - REPORT OF STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE - GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
Ministerial Statement and Paper

Consideration resumed from 24 October 1991, on motion by Ms Follett:

That the Assembly takes note of the papers.

Question resolved in the affirmative.

---

Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .