Page 5033 - Week 17 - Tuesday, 11 December 1990
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .
MR SPEAKER: Thank you for your observation, Mr Berry; but the situation is that he was repeating himself.
Mr Moore: On a point of order, Mr Speaker: in fact, you are now saying that I was repeating myself. You were talking about relevance before. You have ordered me to stop speaking on this particular matter, Mr Speaker, when, quite clearly, I illustrated to you that there was a relationship between trust, because of this particular Bill, and - - -
MR SPEAKER: Yes, thank you, Mr Moore; we heard it.
Mr Moore: So, therefore, Mr Speaker, I think it is appropriate that I be allowed to continue speaking.
MR SPEAKER: Mr Moore, I believe that you were irrelevant and you were repetitious, and I would ask that you now bow - - -
Mr Moore: Mr Speaker, I move dissent from your ruling.
MR SPEAKER: Thank you, Mr Moore. The question is: That the title be agreed to. Those of that opinion - - -
Mr Moore: Mr Speaker, on a point of order: I move dissent from your ruling.
MR SPEAKER: Please read your standing orders, Mr Moore. There is no such provision in standing orders. If you wish to have the standing orders amended - - -
Mr Moore: Mr Speaker, please read House of Representatives Practice.
MR SPEAKER: Order, Mr Moore! You are on thin ground. The question is: That the title be agreed to.
Title agreed to.
Bill, as amended, agreed to.
Wednesday, 12 December 1990
INTERIM PLANNING (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1990
Debate resumed from 29 November 1990, on motion by Mr Kaine:
That this Bill be agreed to in principle.
MR MOORE (12.01 am): Mr Speaker, I hope that I get a less partisan approach from you on this Bill. I had not actually intended to speak to the consequential amendments Bill, because I think that, once a Bill is passed, they, of
Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Contents . . . . Debates(HTML) . . . . PDF . . . .