Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Sittings . . . . PDF . . . . Video

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 2018 Week 13 Hansard (Thursday, 29 November 2018) . . Page.. 5302 ..


(14) Did the selection panel make a preliminary assessment of the applications before deciding whether to proceed to interview of the candidates; if not, why not.

(15) Did the selection panel consider in making a preliminary assessment whether to make an assessment of the applications against the eligibility requirements as to qualifications and experience; if not, why not.

(16) Did the selection panel assess any applicant as failing to meet any of the eligibility requirements as to qualifications and experience, whether mandatory or desirable; if yes, did the selection panel exclude any such applicant from further consideration; if not, why not.

(17) Did the selection panel conduct candidate interviews; if not, why not.

(18) Were those interviews conducted so as to address each of the approved selection criteria; if not, why not.

(19) If interviews were not conducted, how did the panel assess the applications against the approved selection criteria.

(20) What background checking did the selection panel undertake in relation to the employment history of the candidates; if none, why.

(21) Did the selection panel take references from the candidates’ nominated referees; if not, why not.

(22) In what form were the references given.

(23) If references were not given in writing (a) why, (b) to whom were they given and (c) did the recipient provide a written report of the references to the remaining members of the selection panel; if not, why not.

(24) Did individual panel members prepare an assessment report for each candidate against the approved selection criteria; if not, why not.

(25) Did those assessment reports score the candidates against the approved selection criteria; if not, why not.

(26) Did the selection panel recommend the candidate with the highest score to be appointed; if not, why not.

(27) Was the selection panel unanimous in its recommendation as to the preferred candidate.

(28) If not, did any member or members of the selection panel submit any dissenting reports.

(29) Did the selection panel seek to resolve any dissenting views; if yes, what was the outcome; if no, why.

(30) Did the delegate report any dissenting views; if yes (i) to whom was the report given and (ii) what was the recipient’s response; if no, why.


Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Sittings . . . . PDF . . . . Video