Next page . . . . Previous page . . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Sittings . . . . Search

Legislative Assembly for the ACT: 1995 Week 8 Hansard (25 October) . . Page.. 2052..


Question put:

That the amendment (Mr Connolly's) be agreed to.

The Assembly voted -

AYES, 8	 	NOES, 9

Mr Berry	Mrs Carnell
Mr Connolly	Mr Cornwell
Ms Follett	Mr De Domenico
Ms Horodny	Mr Hird
Ms McRae	Mr Humphries
Ms Tucker	Mr Kaine
Mr Whitecross	Mr Moore
Mr Wood		Mr Osborne
		Mr Stefaniak
Question so resolved in the negative.

MR SPEAKER: I would again ask members not to interject when the call is being made. It is very difficult for the Clerks to hear.

MS TUCKER (4.56): Mr Speaker, I move amendment No. 3 circulated in my name, which reads as follows:

Page 4, line 1, paragraph (1)(e), omit the paragraph, substitute the following paragraphs:

"(e) a member with a background in consumer health;

(ea) a member with expertise in community health;

(eb) a member with expertise in environmental health;

(ec) a member with expertise in health generally;".

I have already spoken to the amendment.

MR MOORE (4.57): Mr Speaker, I seek leave to move two amendments concurrently to Ms Tucker's amendment.

Leave granted.

MR MOORE: Thank you, members. The amendment circulated in my name does allow the amendment that Ms Tucker put to be carried. She lost amendment No. 2, which provided for 11 members rather than nine. That is not available to her.


Next page . . . . Previous page. . . . Speeches . . . . Contents . . . . Sittings . . . . Search